09.30.09

My Van der Graaf Generator article in Perfect Sound Forever

Posted in Music tagged , , , at 10:46 am by dpcoffey

In June, I interviewed Van der Graaf Generator in Cleveland, Ohio, prior to their show at the Beachland Ballroom. Here is the published fruit of that event, in the online magazine Perfect Sound Forever. (Thanks to Tim Bugbee for the photos – actually taken from the band’s Boston performance.)

09.20.09

My top 5 “gateway” jazz albums for NPR

Posted in Music tagged , , at 9:49 am by dpcoffey

1. Amy Kohn – I’m in Crinoline
2. Mats Gustafsson – Windows: The Music of Steve Lacy
3. Paul Flaherty/Chris Corsano Duo – The Hated Music
4. Roswell Rudd & Toumani Diabate – Malicool
5. Marilyn Crispell – Vignettes

08.14.09

Godard – Le Petit Soldat

Posted in Film tagged , , , , , , , , , , at 5:45 pm by dpcoffey

On the surface, it seems as though this film was released contemporaneously with Contempt in 1963, but Le Petit Soldat was Godard’s second feature film, completed in 1960, the same year Breathless was released. The French government suppressed the film due to its portrayal of French conduct during the Algerian War, but by 1963, things had loosened up somewhat, and “Soldat” was able to be released.

Up until recently, I had thought of Godard in the early 60s as being an apolitical director. My Life to Live, Contempt, A Woman Is a Woman — all these seemed to be concerned on some level with sexual politics, but not international politics (I had not known about Les Carabiniers until recently, either).

It is impossible to reflect on a viewing of Le Petit Soldat in 2009 without thinking first of torture. The torture sequences in Godard’s film are so incredibly banal that they almost seem calming, and that’s horrifying. This, in contrast to the TV series “24″ where, several seasons ago, Jack Bauer was tortured to the point of near-death. The torture in “24″ is entertainment, and so it goes over-the-top in both the glamour of the brutality and of Bauer’s heroic resistance. I worry that such romanticism actually can actually anesthetize us to the horrors of torture, in just the same way that the endless debates of whether waterboarding is actually torture deflects the central issue.

Godard, by making wartime torture seem so banal — the torturers are blase and the victim an antihero — makes it seem all the more frighteningly real.

And it’s a shame that viewers of this film at the end of this decade will probably take little else away from the movie, because Godard offers us a lot: Anna Karina, in her first Godard role, for starters. He seems to be almost reworking the long hotel room scene from Breathless with Karina and Michel Subor (the secret agent protagonist), and they both do a better job with it than Belmondo and Seberg. And, with the help of Raoul Coutard, Geneva, especially the nighttime skyline, is depicted beautifully.

08.13.09

The Consonance of Vowell

Posted in Books tagged , , , at 8:46 am by dpcoffey

It took me longer than it should have, but I finally finished Sarah Vowell’s most recent book, The Wordy Shipmates. I’ve just started reading a slightly earlier book of hers, Assassination Vacation, and it has me laughing out loud. Wordy Shipmates shows Vowell’s erudition, her passion and commitment to the un-hippest of topics (John Winthrop’s band of Puritans who came over to the New World in 1630), and shows, unnervingly, just how relevant this stuff is to our present-day culture. But it doesn’t show off her sense of humor in the same way as “Assassination” does (at least in the first 30 or so pages). Which is not to say she’s gotten all scholarly on us in “Shipmates”, although there are plenty of scholarly feats, and they’re top-notch, but I think that the topic of Winthrop’s Puritans is perhaps too near to her heart to allow much of the trademark hilarity into these pages.

Or maybe she’s, like me, just getting old.

In any case, I glommed right on to the topic of the Puritans, having had a semi-latent interest in Winthrop and co. ever since my first year in college, when, for an American Lit class, I wrote a paper contrasting Winthrop’s “A Model of Christian Charity” and Jonathan Edwards’ “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”. I think that was the first time that thinking about literature really set my head on fire, and I remember being in a daze for quite awhile after finishing the paper.

I’ve been aware of Vowell peripherally — saw her as a guest on the Daily Show, and knew that she was involved in Ira Glass’ radio show “This American Life”, but it wasn’t until a friend put her first book, Radio On into my hands that I (sorry, if you know me, you knew it was coming) bought the Vowell. I decided to skip to her most recent book and then work my way back. “Wordy Shipmates” was an extremely engaging read for me, at least partially because of my interest in the subject matter, and very informative. (Although the last few pages are uncharacteristically trite.) But it looks like, as I start traveling back through her earlier books, I’m going to be laughing more and more.

08.12.09

Define “kickstart”

Posted in Meta at 10:56 pm by dpcoffey

Did I say something in my last post about having just what I needed to kickstart my blog? Well.

The summer gets away from one, doesn’t it?

More soon.

06.29.09

Ex-Static

Posted in Music tagged , , at 8:40 pm by dpcoffey

It’s taken some time to wrap my head around all that happened on Thursday, June 25, and I’m not talking about Michael Jackson. Last Thursday I flew to Cleveland to attend a concert by the band Van der Graaf Generator. I’ve been a huge fan (some might say obsessive, but I will counter that there are many fans who are FAR more obsessive, and some of them were in attendance Thursday evening, plastic bags bulging with LP sleeves for the band to sign) since the summer of 1988, right before going off to college.

Van der Graaf Generator formed in 1968, split in 1971, reformed in late 1974, and ultimately disbanded in 1978 (their final year saw a radical change in line-up, and the “Generator” stripped from their name). Ever since then, their most public figure, singer, keyboardist and guitarist Peter Hammill soldiered on as a solo artist, releasing, on average, one album per year well into the 2000s. In 2004, roughly 25 years after their final split, the “classic” line-up decided to get back together “just to see if it would work”. If they were going to reform, they wanted to be able to move forward with fresh, new material, and not just rely on the old chestnuts. After some rehearsal it was quickly decided that they still had “it”, and set about making an album, which was released in 2005, and titled “Present”. There was much touring, and a live album released to document the first performance of the reformed band.

But the rekindling of the VdGG magic paid a price. For whatever personal and interpersonal reasons, saxophonist David Jackson left the band. Perversely, this led not to a shutting down of the group, but a radical rethinking of the group’s structure, and the roles of the remaining members. VdGG became an even tighter band – a trio of drums, organ and bass pedals, and Hammill, alternating between guitar and keyboards, on vocals. The three recorded an album in 2008, Trisector, and are, rather incredibly, touring the Eastern and Midwest US as I write this, before moving on to Canada.

But it wasn’t just the concert. It was the fact that, through my connection with a certain online publication, I was able to interview the band in person before the show. The knowledge that before too long I’d be meeting in person the musicians whose work I’d been listening to for twenty years was where the head-wrapping difficulties lay. I’m still working on the details, but if there was something I needed to kickstart the blog again, this was definitely it.

04.09.09

Pandora’s Box and Haxan

Posted in Film, Music at 7:18 pm by dpcoffey

Fairly recently, I watched two old silent movies: Pandora’s Box, and Haxan. One of the only things they had in common (besides being Criterion DVDs with the requisite goodies) was their penchant for dark humor that often belied their sheer pathos. I will touch on the other commonality later in this post.

Pandora's Box, Criterion Collection edition

Pandora’s Box, directed by the German filmmaker G. W. Pabst, was the movie that made a name for Louise Brooks. Watching it, I could easily see how she inspired such a devoted following. I could also read Henri Langlois’s statement (quoted by Kenneth Tynan in his essay from the New Yorker that is reprinted in the Criterion booklet) —

“… As soon as she takes the screen, fiction disappears along with art, and one has the impression of being present at a documentary. The camera seems to have caught her by surprise, without her knowledge. She is the intelligence of the cinematic process, the perfect incarnation of that which is photogenic …. Her art is so pure that it becomes invisible.”

and not take it as hyperbole.

The movie was pretty good too.

A riches to rags story where the former was hung onto by a thread and the latter, once reluctantly embraced, proved fatally inescapable. Brooks’ character sails through the majority of the movie amidst her mates on a Ship of Fools (at times literally) and when she finally disembarks, she finds redemption from the demons that have plagued her, in a very perverse way.

Haxan is a quasi-documentary that investigates witchcraft through the ages. Using still images culled from books on the subject in addition to live-action portrayals of “witchcraft,” hysterical finger-pointing among women in the communities visited by witch-hunting inquisitors, and finally, a contemporary example of what the filmmaker believes drove the women in the middle ages to behave like witches. He uses a mixture of sociology and early psychology to define the affliction that befalls women who have this particular tendency towards abnormal activity. In the end, then, Haxan is a social realist film, and a vehicle by which the director (who appears early in the film as Satan at a witches’ Sabbath) hopes to publicize and address the problem. The film wasn’t as gripping as I thought it might be, but strange enough to hold my interest (and the strangeness lies not so much in the witchcraft, but the oddness of what seemed to be the director’s objective, at last – curing modern social ills).

The thing that really struck me as essential to both these films, or at least to a viewing of them in the Twenty-oughts, with the accrual of archival material and a wealth of documentation for each, is the music. In the case of Pandora’s Box, one can view the film with any one of four different soundtracks: an orchestral score by Gillian Anderson (no, not that Gillian Anderson) meant to approximate “music that an orchestra director of one of the grand European ‘cinema palaces’ might have chosen” (the original soundtrack for the film has been lost); a Weimar-era cabaret score composed by Dimitar Pentchev; a modern orchestral score by Peer Raben, who worked extensively with Fassbinder, and whose score accompanied the showing of the restored print of Pandora’s Box at the Berlin Film Festival in 1997; or a piano improvisation by Stephan Oliva(information from Reflections on Pandora’s Box (Criterion Collection edition accompanying booklet), pp.16-17). After watching a good portion of the movie with all four soundtracks, there was no question that the cabaret score was the ideal accompaniment to the movie. It was so good, in fact, that I think it should be available as a CD. If I owned the DVD, I would probably play it with the TV off just to listen to that soundtrack.

Haxan, Criterion Collection edition

Haxan is presented in two editions: the original 1922 incarnation, which was the brainchild of Danish director Benjamin Christensen, and the 1967 version “prepared” by British filmmaker Anthony Balch. This latter version includes an amazingly atmospheric jazz score by percussionist Daniel Humair*. Although much fuss is made over the Humair-led group including Jean-Luc Ponty, it’s really the interplay between the other members that creates, for me, the memorable audiovisual moments. Whenever I think back to one of the scenes, I hear the music, even though I’ve only seen it once. The 1967 version also features a narration by William S. Burroughs that’s not nearly as creepy as one might suspect.

Conversely, the original 1922 version features a comparatively boring score by, again, Gillian Anderson. She also wrote an essay for the Criterion booklet which is very interesting, but leaves no room for any elaboration on the 1967 Humair score.

So much for “silent” films!

*see previous Steve Lacy-related post.

03.31.09

Whatever Remains (Remembering Steve Lacy, Part 2)

Posted in Books, Music tagged , , , , at 8:11 pm by dpcoffey

What else to say about Lacy? He was my gateway into jazz, which meant a pretty strange path, once through the gate. Lacy led to Roswell Rudd, who led to Herbie Nichols. Lacy led to Mal Waldron, to Cecil Taylor, Marilyn Crispell, Gil Evans – which is how I came to listen to Miles Davis. I always avoided Kind of Blue because it was something I was supposed to like, and that’s no fun. It was also through Lacy that my interest in the poet Robert Creeley was renewed (Lacy did an album of Creeley’s poems set to music, Futurities).

Lacy worked with many poets, both in person and through the page. Not all his choices were on the money; the collaboration with Brion Gysin still makes me cringe. Personally, I think he favored the Beats too much – Lacy’s work with poetry was more interesting when the poets weren’t of that ilk. The work with texts by Russian poets Osip Mandelstam and Anna Akhmatova are among my favorites.

At several points in his career (albums: The Gleam, The Cry, and The Beat Suite) Lacy used poems by Anne Waldman, a poet who aligned herself with the Beats, but could not really be said to be one of them. In 1999/2000, when I was newly but heavily into Lacy, and still very much discovering what was out there in terms of his recorded work, I was also working on a scholarly bibliography of the publications of Anne Waldman. Waldman had just sold her “papers” to the University of Michigan – Ann Arbor’s Library. I made an appointment with the archivist to examine her papers, which they had just received and were still very unorganized. If this piece were about Waldman and not Lacy, I’d have much more to say about my days in Ann Arbor, but suffice to say that in her papers was a letter from Lacy inviting her to his (and Irene Aebi’s) place in France to hang out and create something like a song cycle.

Michael Kelleher’s comment on Part 1 of this post got me thinking that it was indeed at the Calumet that I saw Lacy for the first time. It might well have been the same show that Michael saw, but I don’t remember Creeley being there. You might think that seeing Robert Creeley and Lacy bow to each other would be a memorable occurence, especially for a stumbling poet and admirer of poetry like me, but I may have been too entranced by the music (or off to the bar… let’s not get too romantic here) to notice.

I saw Lacy twice more, both times in Saint Paul at a place called the Dakota Bar & Grill. Once with the stalwart Jean-Jacques Avenel and John Betsch, and another time with the same rhythm section plus Irene Aebi and George Lewis on trombone. After the first show, the friend I went with went up to talk to Avenel, who seemed appreciative of my friend’s glowing comments, but very tired. I spotted Lacy at the far end of the four-sided bar, so I got up my courage to go over and talk to him. I sat down next to him, and asked him how his teaching stint went at Naropa University (he and Irene Aebi had been invited to give a class on songwriting). I got no response – Lacy just stared straight ahead and down. I tried again with a simple “I really enjoyed the show!” Nothing. I slowly slunk away and told my friend what had happened.

Much to my chagrin, my friend collared the venue’s manager and told him that we had driven some 300 miles for this show and Lacy wouldn’t even talk to me. The manager apologetically explained that Lacy and crew had been driving to St. Paul from Chicago in snowy weather and had gotten into an accident en route that caused them to have to stay up all night – they were all working on zero sleep. He said that he’d tell Lacy, however, that we came from so far away, and he was sure Steve would be delighted. Completely embarrassed and feeling like a puppy-dog, I walked behind the manager as he went up to Lacy, and listened to him rehash what my friend had told him about our long journey. Lacy did seem genuinely touched and perked up, as though he had been sleeping – meditating? We talked about Naropa, Waldman, and poetry in general for a few minutes, and I thanked him for the music blah blah blah, and he signed my copy of his CD Remains, writing the word “Whatever” above the eponymous word so it would flow into the title as an enigmatic phrase, followed by an ellipsis, and then his signature.

So, whatever remains? That haunting, joyful music. He made so much of it. And there are so many records now unavailable to virtually all but the ebay high-rollers and those who were lucky enough to be in the know in the first place. Disproving the rule that deceased musicians’ recordings become infinitely more available after the death, Lacy’s albums seem to be going out of print on a regular basis. And that’s not even touching the number of albums on labels like FMP and HATArt that don’t seem interested in putting his music back in circulation. He released albums on so many different labels that I imagine it would be hard to get the rights to many of the recordings, but the labels Lacy recorded for that are still thriving should be ashamed that they haven’t put as much of Lacy’s music out as possible.

I’ve since rebuilt my Lacy collection after my trip to Belgium, and even surpassed the original. Without knowing until much later the particular history that Lacy had in Belgium, the great number of intimate concerts he had there, culminating with the duet performance featuring Joelle Leandre, poignantly titled One More Time. Last Friday I was playing School Days, the only recording of the quartet Lacy co-led with Roswell Rudd in the early 60s which played nothing but Thelonious Monk compositions, I borrowed a DVD of the film HAXAN from the library where I work. The film was from the silent era, and a quasi-documentary of the history of witchcraft. It was re-released in the late 60s with a new jazz score written by drummer Daniel Humair. Who? That’s what I would have asked myself, but for the CD Work, released several years before Lacy’s death and featuring the trio of Lacy, Anthony Cox, and Daniel Humair.

Whatever remains? The music. And the worlds – the people, the artists, the listeners – that Lacy connected between the notes.

03.18.09

Remembering Steve Lacy

Posted in Music tagged , at 2:45 pm by dpcoffey

The latest red envelope from Netflix in my mailbox contained the DVD Steve Lacy: Master of the Soprano Sax. It’s the same documentary as the one titled Lift the Bandstand, released some 10 or so years earlier. Watching the DVD made me think of the history of my Lacy listening experiences, and of course, of the man himself.

Master of the Soprano Sax DVD

The DVD is essential for anyone who wants to get a sense of how Lacy fits into 20C jazz history, his style, his personality, and just how mesmerising his band was (Irene Aebi, Steve Potts, Bobby Few, Jean-Jacques Avenel, Oliver Johnson, and Lacy) in live performances. The interview was conducted in the late 1980s. Lacy takes the faceless interviewer, and the viewer, through his early childhood in a musical family, his discovery of jazz, his apprenticeship with various bandleaders, on to his more advanced tutelage under Cecil Taylor and Thelonious Monk. Rare footage of Sidney Bechet (Lacy’s introduction to the soprano sax) and Coltrane (himself introduced to the possibilities of the instrument while watching Lacy perform) playing is included on the disc. Finally, Lacy brings his story up through the 60s, where he started a combo with Roswell Rudd devoted entirely to the exploration of Monk’s compositions, and later, when it became impossible to survive as a musician in New York, his move to Europe. Strangely missing is the 1970s, which is a pivotal period for Lacy. This is the decade where he first decided to perform and record solo, being the second sax player (Anthony Braxton did it first with For Alto) to attempt such a thing. He also began to experiment with low-tech electronics, played with Derek Bailey for the first time, and joined the avant-garde group Musica Elettronica Viva.

Weal and Woe

I first encountered Lacy’s music in either 1998 or 1999, going to a concert of his in Buffalo on a whim. I was so blown away by the performance that I bought Five Facings and Weal and Woe the next day. The latter very much appealed to my musical sensibilities at the time (skronk and chaos), while the former became something I would play when calmness was desired. (These days, I’m glad to have a copy of Weal and Woe, but don’t often have the urge, or the nerve, to put it on, but I think Five Facings ranks among my top 10 most-played discs.)

Original 1996 release on the FMP label
Five Facings, 2008 reissue

I’m a fair-weather fan much of the time, slipping into intense love affairs with the music of both mainstream and “out-there” artists, and then just as quickly losing the thread. The times where the thread hasn’t been dropped are rare. Something about Lacy’s music shook me to the core. I kept buying his discs; there was no dearth of them! Between record stores in Rochester and Buffalo, NY, and occasional trips to Toronto, I was never hungry for very long. By the summer of 2002, I’ll bet I had around 40 Lacy CDs, including solo and duet recordings (he recorded a number of duets with pianist Mal Waldron, and quite a few other one-time-only duets with other musicians), and recordings of bands of various sizes of which Lacy was the leader. The summer of 2002 isn’t an arbitrary marking point; that’s when I sold almost all of my compact discs to partially finance an extended trip to Belgium. Including the Lacy discs. (To be continued.)

03.07.09

Missing Months, Memes, and Poets

Posted in Books tagged , , at 3:28 pm by dpcoffey

So, February goes unrepresented in PftB. It was just a month to get through.

Evie Shockley recently posted an interesting meme-note on Facebook, asking, more or less, what lines of poetry stick in your head on a regular basis. I thought about that, and there’s really only one that pops up with any regularity:

They said / “Jerome, Jerome, / return to your village.” / I did so, and began / to lick postage stamps.

It’s from Ron Padgett’s poem “Early Triangles“, the first poem in his 1979 book Triangles in the Afternoon (SUN Press). I love Padgett’s poems, and there are many that I like more than this one, but this is the one that has established residency in my brain alongside those ubiquitous songs like “O Come All Ye Faithful” and “Carry On, My Wayward Son”.

*

I’ve recently had the pleasure of discovering the work of poet Hoa Nguyen. Her book Red Juice has been on every table in my house that books go when they’re not being constantly read. The recent Kiss a Bomb Tattoo is also excellent, but I haven’t yet had time to sink into it as deeply as I’d like. I’m backtracking as well, with my library copy of her turn-of-the-century book Your Ancient See-Through (Sub Press), which presents a rather more scattered but no less vibrant display of poetry. I’m waiting for her imminently forthcoming book, Hecate Lochia (Hot Whiskey Press), before I come back to this space with a more thorough commentary on Hoa’s work. You should use this time to buy her books (“Red Juice” and “Bomb Tattoo” are available from Effing Press) and familiarize yourself with them, so that we can be on the same page.

Next page